Your working prototype is a trap.


Hey Reader,

It’s one of the most logical ways to start a SaaS company.

You build an internal tool for your own business. You use it, you refine it, and it works flawlessly. You've already de-risked the idea and proven it creates value, right?

Wrong. You’ve just swapped one risk for a bigger, more subtle one.

The success of an internal tool proves it solves your problem. It does not prove you have a commercially viable product.

Think of it this way: you’ve designed a bespoke suit, perfectly tailored to your exact measurements and needs. It fits you better than anything you could buy off the rack. Now, you’re trying to sell it as a one-size-fits-all jacket.

This false sense of security is dangerous. It causes you to overvalue features that an outside market simply doesn't care about, because those features were built for your specific workflows, your team, and your priorities.

An external customer won't need 100% of your features. They might only value 30% and be completely unwilling to pay for the rest.

Before you write a single line of code for the public version, your job is to relentlessly hunt for the answer to one question:

"Which 20% of this tool would an outside customer pay 100% of the price for?"

Finding that answer is the only validation that matters.

— Dmitry

P.S. If you're struggling to figure out which parts of your product the market will actually pay for, this is what I help founders do in a single session. Let's spend 30 minutes finding that core value. Book your free strategy call.

Clarity Filter

Every week, I advise founders on how to hit $10k MRR. On Tuesdays, I share my consulting notes from those private sessions. Learn from their mistakes so you don't burn your own cash.

Read more from Clarity Filter

Hey Reader, Founders love to pitch an inevitable future. They see a clear shift in the market, build a product for that future, and launch. Then they get silent buyers and a dead pipeline. They assume the product is broken. Or the marketing is wrong. But the problem is usually much simpler: they are early. And in an early-stage startup, being ahead of your time is functionally indistinguishable from being wrong. A market can be directionally attractive and still be a terrible opportunity...

Hey Reader, In my last email, I broke down how Sam Altman’s relationship network literally purchased his first company's failure for millions. Most builders read that and thought: "Great, but I don't live in SF and I don't know any VCs." You are looking at networking all wrong. You don’t need billionaires. You need a net of adjacent peers who are 6 to 12 months ahead of you. If you want to know if your current network is there yet, here's a handy validator for ya: Look at your calendar for...

Hey Reader, Founders love the myth of the exceptional product. They believe Silicon Valley legends won because they built better software. Here is the reality. Sam Altman's first company, Loopt, had no real traction. It failed as a consumer product. It was acquired for millions anyway. Not because the tech was brilliant. Because Altman had well-connected VC relationships. When the app failed, his network caught him. The relationships were the infrastructure that literally purchased his...