Ship it at 70% or burn the runway polishing nothing


Hey Reader,

A founder told me recently he likes to be 90% happy with something before he ships it.

I told him that's the fastest way to waste two months on something the market doesn't want.

I aim for 70%.

Here's the math most people refuse to do:

Expect roughly 70% of what you launch to fail or require a hard pivot. Not because you're bad at this – because that's the baseline reality of building something new. Competition, timing, messaging, market fit – too many variables outside your control.

So what happens when you wait until 90% to ship?

  • You spend extra weeks polishing a product nobody's validated
  • You burn runway on refinement instead of research
  • You get feedback 60 days later than you needed it
  • And when the market tells you to pivot, you've optimized the wrong thing beautifully

The fix isn't more polish. The fix is faster feedback.

At 70%, you have enough to learn. The remaining 30% should be informed by the market, not invented in isolation. If it doesn't sell, that last 20% of development won't save it. A full pivot might.

The Clarity Filter Insight

Speed to feedback is your only real competitive advantage – stop burning it on polish.
[Share on LinkedIn] [Share on X]

If you're sitting on something that's "almost ready," ask yourself what you're actually waiting for. A perfect version of something untested is still untested. Ship the 70%, get the reply, then decide what the next 30% should even be.

Speak soon,
— Dmitry

P.S. Don't write code for a product nobody wants to buy. I built Traction OS to give you the exact 60-day roadmap, sales scripts, and validation templates you need to hit your first $10k MRR without guessing. From complete scratch or with an existing MVP.

Clarity Filter

Every week, I advise founders on how to hit $10k MRR. On Tuesdays, I share my consulting notes from those private sessions. Learn from their mistakes so you don't burn your own cash.

Read more from Clarity Filter
A split illustration showing a buyer feeling threatened by a tool that could replace his job on one side, and empowered by a tool that makes him look valuable and successful on the other—highlighting that B2B buyers want job security, not automation.

Hey Reader, Alex had a great demo call with Billy, a marketing manager at an e-commerce brand. Billy asked good questions. Billy seemed interested. Then Billy went quiet. Alex assumed the product wasn't good enough. It was. The pitch was the problem. Alex was selling: "this tool does your email retention work for you." Billy heard: "this tool could do your job without you." That is not a sales pitch. That is a threat. Here is what most B2B founders miss when selling to employees rather than...

A split illustration showing wasted spend on ineffective LinkedIn ads on one side, and a founder building trust through content and organic reach on the other—highlighting that relationships drive results, not cold ads.

Hey Reader, A client came to me frustrated. They had the right targeting. The right demographics. E-commerce decision-makers, correct job titles, correct company sizes. Their LinkedIn ad campaign looked perfect on paper – and it was producing almost nothing. I wasn't surprised. Here's the thing nobody in your marketing agency will say out loud: LinkedIn's ad algorithm is years behind Facebook. It lacks the deep behavioral and intent data that makes paid social actually work. When you run a...

A split illustration showing a founder obsessing over building a “better” product in isolation on one side, and another winning through audience trust and distribution on the other—highlighting that access to customers beats product features.

Hey Reader, A founder asked me last week how to respond to someone pitching a Shopify quiz app – 10x more expensive than existing competitors, no unique technology, no obvious edge. He expected me to help him dismantle the idea. Instead, I told him: I don't care about the idea. Here's the truth most early-stage founders don't want to hear: your product quality is almost never your real competitive advantage. You can have a worse product at a higher price and still win – if you have...